Disconnected systems
Sales, stock, payroll and the ledger live in different places, so nobody can see the whole picture without a day of manual work.
Systems implementation
Most businesses do not fail with software because they bought the wrong product. They fail because nobody designed how the business would run inside it. We take an accounting-led approach to implementation: we start with how money moves through your business, then configure the system to reflect that reality, then migrate the data and train the people who will use it every day.
Sales, stock, payroll and the ledger live in different places, so nobody can see the whole picture without a day of manual work.
The same invoice is typed into two or three systems, which multiplies both the workload and the error rate.
Month-end closes two or three weeks after the month, by which time the numbers no longer support a decision.
The system says one thing, the warehouse says another, and nobody can explain the difference.
Codes added over the years by different people, so comparable reporting across periods or branches is impossible.
A purchase made on a demonstration rather than on your requirements, leaving gaps that get filled with spreadsheets.
A typical engagement moves through these work packages. Scope is agreed in writing before any configuration begins, and each work package has defined outputs you keep whether or not you continue with us.
Structured workshops with finance, operations, sales and management. We document current processes, decision points, statutory requirements, reporting needs, user roles and volumes. Output: a written requirements specification with priorities.
Where the platform is not yet decided, we build a scored comparison against your requirements covering functionality, total cost of ownership, deployment options, local statutory fit, integration capability and vendor viability. Output: a recommendation with reasons, including the options we rejected and why.
We map the processes that matter — order to cash, procure to pay, stock movement, payroll, project and contract billing — and identify where approvals, controls and automation belong. Output: as-is and to-be process maps with control points marked.
Company set-up, tax configuration, document series, approval workflows, user roles and permissions, custom fields, and the specific behaviour each department needs. Output: a configured environment plus a configuration record explaining each decision.
A ledger structure built for reporting, not just for posting: cost centres or dimensions for branch, project or product line, clear account groupings, and mapping from the old structure. Output: chart of accounts with reporting hierarchy and mapping table.
Extraction, cleansing, de-duplication and transformation of customers, suppliers, items, opening balances and, where agreed, historical transactions. Output: migration scripts, a cleansing log and reconciliation of source to target.
Bank, receivables, payables, stock and tax balances agreed to the signed prior accounts and to third-party confirmations. Output: an opening balance reconciliation signed off by your finance lead.
Payment gateways, banking feeds, payroll, e-commerce, point of sale, logistics providers and any specialist system that must keep working. Output: documented interfaces with error handling and a monitoring routine.
The management pack you actually review, plus operational reports for each department. We build them in the system rather than in spreadsheets wherever the platform allows. Output: report library with definitions and refresh instructions.
Role-based training rather than a single generic session, with written procedures your team keeps. Output: training delivered plus a procedure manual per role.
User acceptance testing against real scenarios, including the awkward ones — part payments, credit notes, returns, multi-currency, inter-company. Output: a test script, results log and sign-off.
Cut-over plan, parallel running where warranted, a named point of contact for the first weeks, and daily review of exceptions. Output: go-live confirmation and an exceptions log closed out.
Agreed support window, then an optional retainer covering updates, additional users, report changes and periodic control review.
A focused call or meeting to understand the business, the trigger for the project and what success looks like. No charge, no obligation.
We review your current processes, data and systems, and interview the people who use them. This is where most failed implementations are prevented.
A written scope, phased plan, deliverables, responsibilities and fee basis. We set out what is excluded as clearly as what is included.
We build the solution in a test environment while your team continues on the current system.
Migration rehearsals, then user acceptance testing with your people, on your scenarios.
Role-based training, cut-over, and close support through the first month-end on the new system.
A structured review against the objectives we agreed at the start, then ongoing support on agreed terms.
Preparation is where most engagements are won or lost. The more of this you can gather before we start, the faster the work goes and the more accurately we can scope it.
These are the outcomes the work is designed to produce. We do not promise a specific percentage saving or a fixed payback period, because both depend on how the business uses the system after go-live.
We do not publish a price list. The drivers below vary too much between businesses for a published figure to be honest — and a price quoted before an assessment is usually wrong in one direction or the other.
| Factor | How it affects the engagement |
|---|---|
| Number of modules in scope | Accounting alone is a fraction of the work involved in accounting, stock, purchasing, manufacturing and payroll. |
| Data quality and volume | Cleaning a decade of inconsistent customer and item records is often the single largest task in a migration. |
| Process complexity | Multi-branch approvals, inter-company trading, sub-contracting and project billing all add design and testing effort. |
| Number of entities and currencies | Consolidation and multi-currency handling require additional configuration and testing. |
| Integrations required | Each interface adds build, testing and error-handling work, particularly where the other system is undocumented. |
| User count and locations | Training across sites and shift patterns takes longer than a single central session. |
| Availability of your team | The most common cause of slippage. We plan around realistic availability rather than optimistic availability. |
| Historical data migrated | Opening balances only is far faster than migrating several years of transactions. |
We quote after the assessment, on a fixed-fee basis for defined work packages or a day rate for advisory and support work. Licences and hosting are quoted separately and are normally contracted directly between you and the platform provider.
It depends on modules, data quality and how quickly decisions are made. A focused single-entity accounting implementation is measured in weeks; a multi-module, multi-site project is measured in months. We give you a phased plan with the dependencies named, rather than a single date we cannot guarantee.
Yes, and you should. We build and test in a separate environment while you continue operating. Cut-over is planned, and for larger projects we run both systems in parallel for a period so the numbers can be compared before the old system is retired.
Usually not. Most businesses migrate opening balances plus the current year, and keep the old system available read-only for reference. We help you decide what genuinely needs to move, because migrating unnecessary history adds cost and risk.
That is a normal starting point. We run a requirements assessment and a scored comparison first, and we will recommend against a platform if it does not fit — including recommending a simpler, cheaper product than an ERP where that is the honest answer.
You do. Configuration records, process maps, report definitions and procedure manuals are delivered to you. If you later move to another adviser, they inherit documentation rather than guesswork.
Generally no. Licences are normally purchased by you directly from the provider, so that your commercial relationship, pricing and support entitlement sit with the business that owns the data. We focus on implementation and support. Where a reseller arrangement exists we disclose it in writing before any purchase.
An agreed support window covering defects and questions, then an optional retainer for updates, new users, report changes and periodic control review. The first month-end on a new system always raises questions, and you should have someone to ask.
Tell us what you are dealing with. We will tell you honestly whether we can help, what it would involve and what it would cost.